The 78 of 242 companies on this site whose price today sits above the range the four methods put on them, ranked from the least above to the most. It's a calculation, not a pick:
a list of the ones that look cheap is also a list of the ones the market has doubts about.
68 more companies in the screener
Every company's own page is free. Pro is the whole list ranked side by side, all
78 of them, plus unlimited analyses, a watchlist, and an email when a price crosses
its range.
See what Pro includes →
Screener analysis
What today's list says, in plain English
worth a closer look
Everything below comes from the table on this page: the same companies, prices and ranges, read as one story. It answers the questions a person has about a list like this, in the order they usually ask them.
What's on the list?
78 companies, ranked by how far today's price sits from what a share looks to be worth, biggest discount first. 0 sit more than 10% below their fair value, 0 within 10% of it, and 78 more than 10% above. It's a calculation, not a pick: the expensive ones are on the list too.
How cheap is cheap?
Nothing on the list sits below its fair value right now; the smallest premium is HD, about 10% above.
Which way does the list lean?
Half the list sits more than 56% above fair value. That says more about which companies have been valued than about the market: the list is whoever has been run through the calculator, not the whole market.
Where do they cluster?
Technology is the biggest group, 26 of the 78, sitting on average about 72% above their ranges. Then Industrials (16, about 63% above) and Healthcare (7, about 62% above).
How fresh is it?
The prices are live. The ranges are not: each one was worked out on the date in the "range as of" column, from what the company had reported by then. 55 of the 78 ranges are from the last week, and 23 are older, dimmed in the table. The oldest goes back to September 4. A price can move a long way in that time while the range stays put, so an old row's gap is partly age.
How sure are the ranges?
62 of the 78 ranges rest on all four methods. 16 rest on fewer, because a method sat out (a company that lost money can't be valued on its profit, and one burning cash can't be valued on its cash), and those ranges are shakier for it.
What the rank leaves out
The order is arithmetic: today's price against a blend of four estimates. It doesn't know whether the business is earning its keep, whether a cheap one is cheap for a reason, or how far apart the four methods landed. Each company's page answers all three, under "Why this verdict" and "Fundamental analysis".
The bottom line
78 companies, 0 of them more than 10% below their ranges, with the widest gaps at the top. The one to open is the company you already own or already wonder about, not the one at the top of the list. A discount is a question, and the company's page is where it gets answered. None of this is a recommendation.
How to use it
- Start from a company you know, not from the top of the list.
- On its page, read "Why this verdict", especially whether cheap is a good sign there.
- Check how far apart the four methods landed. Bunched is more convincing than scattered.
- Add it to a watchlist to get an email when the price crosses the range.
How to read this
The price is live; the range is not. Each range was worked out on the date in the
"range as of" column, from the numbers the company had reported by then, and it only changes
when that company is analysed again. Rows older than a week are dimmed.
The last column is how far today's price sits from the fair
value, the blend of the four methods. A minus number means the price is below it, a plus number
means above. Neither is a conclusion on its own. How far apart the four methods landed matters
as much as their average, which is why every row links to the working.
How it's calculated ·
What each term means
Educational tool, not investment advice. These are automated estimates from
third-party data, impersonal and not tailored to anyone's situation. Data can be inaccurate and model
assumptions can be wrong. We are not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. Always do your
own research. See our
methodology and
terms.